WEKO3
アイテム
Research on judgment of suitability concerning descriptions of definition of terms in mathematics textbooks for lower secondary school
http://hdl.handle.net/10780/1046
http://hdl.handle.net/10780/104679bacd3e-87e4-425a-b1e0-8150e483bbf7
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
4017-Kyogoku-2011.pdf (306.0 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2011-05-20 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Research on judgment of suitability concerning descriptions of definition of terms in mathematics textbooks for lower secondary school | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | ETYP:教育関連論文 | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | textbook analysis | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | mathematics textbook for lower secondary school | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | descriptions of definition of terms | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||
| 著者 |
京極, 邦明
× 京極, 邦明 |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | The purpose of this study is to examine teachers' judgment concerning descriptions of definition of terms composed by the author and based on mathematics textbooks for lower secondary school. For this purpose the author asked 306 lower secondary school mathematics teachers to be participants of this research. Findings revealed that (1) Concrete examples are necessary in case of defining“variables based on constant''. But in case of“substitution”，a concrete example is not necessary. And necessity of concrete examples depends on the context in which the terms are used．(2)“congruence”，should not be defined in two grades. It should be defined in only 7th. Teachers think that descriptions of definition based on the one used in elementary school mode and expressed in symbol is not proper in lower secondary school in case of“parallel”．(3) As to the basic mathematics concept such as“invariable''，teachers think that in case of“constant”,“fixed number”or letters representing“fixed number”is proper. In case of “Theorem of circumference angle”，“all（angles) are equal”is proper. Thus, proper descriptions of“invariable，'depend on the context in which they are used. (4) Those who use the textbook A think that in case of“Absolute value"，descriptions based on their textbooks are proper. In contrast with this，in case of“Prime number”they think that the description is not proper. Teachers do not necessarily prefer the descriptions based on their textbooks familiar to them. |
|||||
| 書誌情報 |
福岡教育大学紀要. 第四分冊, 教職科編 Bulletin of Fukuoka University of Education. Part IV, Education and psychology 巻 60, p. 169-177, 発行日 2011-02-10 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0286-3235 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 福岡教育大学 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 値 | 紀要論文 Article | |||||
